Hello, thanks for the anwser. In fact, with more research, we have found the problem has been partially fixed in the 1.6 revision with this check-in in revision 369808 : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=369808&view=rev
But that fix is only partial and doesn't solve our problem, because it fixes only the DOC_LITERAL case, and not the RPC_ENCODED case. Proposed patch based on the latest SoapDeSerializer.cpp version available from this URL (adding a required check on m_pNode too): http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/webservices/axis/trunk/c/src/soap/SoapDeSerializer.cpp --- SoapDeSerializer.cpp 2006-04-06 13:40:41.000000000 +0200 +++ SoapDeSerializerFix.cpp 2006-04-06 02:50:55.096619672 +0200 @@ -1598,20 +1598,20 @@ } else if (m_pNode && (END_ELEMENT == m_pNode->m_type) && bNillFound ) //xsi:nil="true" { pSimpleType->deserialize(NULL); m_pNode = NULL; return; } - else if (END_ELEMENT == m_pNode->m_type) // We have an empty string - Jira AXISCPP-93 + else if (m_pNode && (END_ELEMENT == m_pNode->m_type) ) // We have an empty string - Jira AXISCPP-93 { pSimpleType->deserialize(""); - m_pNode = m_pParser->next(); + m_pNode = NULL; return; } else { // simpleType may have xsi:nill="true" */ //m_pNode = NULL; // this is important when deserializing // arrays We also seem to have a problem with non US-ASCII requests, even when they apparently are properly UTF-8 declared and encoded. We have not been able yet to understand what happens. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:tss="urn:tokenSoapService" xmlns:types="urn:tokenSoapService/encodedTypes" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <soap:Body soap:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"> <tss:make_token> <text1 xsi:type="xsd:string">eeéee</text1> <text2 xsi:type="xsd:string">TEXT2</text2> </tss:make_token> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope> Text1 seems to be handled just like if it were empty in our test. Our treatment gets the right value for text2. Best regards --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ce message et tous les fichiers qui y sont attachés contiennent des informations confidentielles ou appartenant à Dictao. Ils sont destinés à l'intention exclusive de son (ses) destinataire(s). Toute divulgation, utilisation, diffusion ou reproduction (totale ou partielle) de ce message, ou des informations qu'il contient, doit être préalablement autorisée. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération et son intégrité ne peut être assurée. Dictao décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été modifié ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur de l'erreur de distribution et de la destruction du message. Dictao - RCS Paris B 429 383 979 - 42, avenue de la Grande Armée - 75017 Paris This e-mail and all the attached files contain confidential information or information belonging to Dictao. They are intended solely for the addressee(s). The unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. Dictao shall not be liable for this e-mail if modified or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender of the wrong delivery and the mail deletion. Dictao - Registered Office : Paris B 429 383 979 - 42, avenue de la Grande Armée - 75017 Paris - France
