Hi Sahan,

Sahan Gamage wrote:

Hi all,

If I get it correctly, according to the new structure, we won't have the
"modules" directory any more. I personally don't like the idea of not
having the "modules" directory. Also where is the "addressing" module ?
Also I don't understand the reason for the wsdl module brought to top
level ? Is wsdl module going to be a separate project ? I thought it is
a part of axis2 core.
I would rather go for something like this.

c/
|- modules/
|    |- core/
|    |    |- wsdl/ (if I am not mistaken)
|    |    |- other core modules
|    |- addressing/
|    |- security/ (or rampart) - in the future
|- util/
|- axiom/
|- xml-schema/
|- woden/
|- guththila/
Thanks for the idea. It is really good if we move xml_schema, woden, util, axiom, security and guththila into root level. i.e. to c folder.
So now the folder structure would be

c/
|- modules/
|    |- core/
|    |
|    |- addressing/
|    |
|    |- wsdl/
| |- security/ (or rampart) - in the future
|- util/
|- axiom/
|- xml-schema/
|- woden/
|- guththila/



Thanks
Damitha

- Sahan


Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:

nandika jayawardana wrote:

Hi,
In addition to the above folder structure we will have to move out
guththila as a seperate project ( at the moment guththila is also in
xml folder).
+ 1.

Samisa...


thanks
nandika


On 5/17/06, *Damitha Kumarage* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

   Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:

   > Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
   >
   >> Correct prefix...
   >>
   >> -------- Original Message --------
   >> Subject:     Modified Axis2C folder structure
   >> Date:     Wed, 17 May 2006 16:40:27 +0600
   >> From:     Damitha Kumarage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
   >> Reply-To:     Apache AXIS C Developers List
   <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
   >> To:     [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >> Hi,
   >> Since we are going to separate Axis2 C sub/dependant projects
into
   >> separate projects
   >> and at the same time keep them under Axis2 C folder struture
   for some
   >> time, I would like to propose the
   >> following folder structure.
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >>                                                         C
   >>                                                          |
   >>
   >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   >>
   >>         |               |                  |
   >> |                  |                  |
>> util axiom xml-schema woden wsdl
   >>     core
   >>
   >> Note that axiom contains all parser, soa and om related stuff.
util
   >> contain all
   >> platform stuff as well.
   >
   >
   > +1.
   >
   >>
   >> In make install the sub/dependant project includes go into into
   >> c/inclue as following
   >>
   >>                                                         C
   >>                                                          |
   >>                                                     include
   >>                                                          |
>> _________________________________________________________________
   >>     |                      |
   >> |                                                   |
   >>   util                  om
   >> woden                                      xml_schema
   >>
   >> Other headers all go into c/include as before
   >
   >
   > Please rename om to axiom
   > Also does this mean that we have to prefix the header inclusion
   with
   > folder name? If yes then that is lots of trouble.

   OK, Then for the time being I'll have axiom and util  headers
   installed
   into  c/include. Other wise we will have to
   change all header files to include prefixed with project  name

   > Also, I propose to keep the same prefix even if we now have
   different
   > folder names. e.g. even tough om and soap headers are in axiom
   folder,
   > the prefix would remain as axis2_om and axis2_soap.
   >
   > P.S. is there anyway we can shorten xml_schema?

   I prefer to keep it xml_schema because this going to be a C
version of
   Xml Schema project. We did no architecture
   changes to Xml Schema so keeping the name as it is a good thing

   Thanks
   Damitha

   >
   > Thanka,
   > Samisa...
   >
   >>
   >> All libs goes into c/lib.
   >>
   >> Thanks
   >> Damitha
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >
   >





Reply via email to