I am looking at how fault handling is done, and I see that we generate
code like the following (using FaultMappingDoc test case) when the
CmplxFaultName does not match:
else
{
const char *detail =
pSoapFault->getSimpleFaultDetail();
bool deleteDetail=false;
if (NULL==detail || 0==strlen(detail))
{
detail=m_pCall->getFaultAsXMLString();
if (NULL==detail)
detail="";
else
deleteDetail=true;
}
OtherFaultException
ofe(pSoapFault->getFaultcode(),
pSoapFault->getFaultstring(),
pSoapFault->getFaultactor(),
detail, iExceptionCode);
if (deleteDetail && NULL!=detail)
Axis::AxisDelete( (void *)
const_cast<char*>(detail), XSD_STRING);
m_pCall->unInitialize();
delete pSoapFault;
throw ofe;
}
My question is whether the call to AxisDelete is a bug, since from what I
can tell getSimpleFaultDetail() does not return a new pointer.
Nadir K. Amra
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
