Given the scale of change, I would like to call a code freeze to
facilitate this change.
I would like to freeze the code from now on till the task is complete.
Thanks,
Samisa...
Nandika Jayawardana wrote:
+1 for change.
nandika
On 5/31/06, *Samisa Abeysinghe* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
If there are no objections, I would go ahead and make this change
either
today or tomorrow.
Thanks,
Samisa...
Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> Hi All,
> For almost all the method calls, we pass the environment as a
> double pointer. This was originally done thinking that we could
create
> an environment in case the user did not supply a correct pointer.
> However, after the code evolved, now we realize that this view is
> flawed. We do not need a double pointer here.
>
> For new users, use of a double pointer would look strange.
> Moreover, it is inefficient to use a double pointer, especially
given
> that fact that all the methods are using it (though bulk of the
getter
> functions do not need it)
>
> The better and the correct approach would be to change it to
"const
> axis2_env_t *".
>
> This change is very time consuming and also would affect
those that
> are already using the API. However, we better change this now,
rather
> than waiting till late.
>
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
