I think we can re-introduce if need be. I do not think the current use would benefit support for C++ namespaces and the method itself is very simple.
Thanks. Nadir K. Amra Adrian Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/19/2006 10:51:52 AM: > Hi, Nadir, > > I'm all for simplification ... but just one thought.... > Is there anyway the getPackageName4QualifiedName.... methods could be used > to exploit C++ namespaces, as I know others have asked for in the past. > That said, I suspect there would be quite a lot of work elsewhere to > properly support this, so maybe it would make more sense to re-introduce > the function when someone gets to implementing C++ namespaces. > > Adrian > _______________________________________ > Adrian Dick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > Nadir Amra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/07/2006 15:18:52: > > > I plan on removing stuff that is related to the generation of java code - > > > I assume this was just an oversight in not being removed previously. For > > example, in TypeMap we have java keywords array. And in WrapperUtils we > > have getPackegeName4QualifiedName....etc. > > > > Simplify, simplify, simplify :-) > > > > I plan on doing this in the next day or two so let me know if there are > > any objections. > > > > Nadir K. Amra > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
