Hi, I also agree to put completion of C codegen tool to post 1.0 activity. It seems it would take some time to improve it at least up to the level of c code generation done with wsdl2java tool specially with schema generation. I think 1.0 need not to be delayed due to this.
So +1 for not including codegen to 1.0 release. Thanks Dimuthu On 3/17/07, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would also like to propose that we drop Woden and XML schema form 1.0. We originally planned to implement dynamic client and WSDL parsing on these libs. However the core engine are not dependant on them. Also C based code generation tool is not maintained that well. We mostly patch the Java based code generation tool. Unless we have volenteers to maintain Woden, XMLSchema and C codegen tools, it is no point including them in 1.0. Also, if we wait tilll they are perfect to release 1.0, it would take another 3-6 months to release 1.0. I do not think that does justice to the core engine which is far more stable. Thanks, Samisa... Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Dynamic client invocation code has been experimental and would require > considerable time to fix it. Especially Woden/C is far from complete. > Unless there are volunteers that are willing to fix this in the > immediate future, I propose that we keep that out form the 1.0 release. > > Samisa... > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
