Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
On 5/30/07, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given that new code is similar to old code and is better, why not
replace current code in Guththila with new code? That helps in terms of
maintenance I suppose - rather than to maintain two code bases, maintain
one. What advantage would we get keeping both the code bases without
replacing old with new?
The new parser is completely different from Guththila except it has
the same interface as Guththila. So I'm not hundred percent confident,
in replacing the Guththila code at once. I would like to suggest we
keep both projects at least for the initial period of time and if
Musila turns out to be better than Guththila in every aspect we can
remove the code.
I would like to repeat that my main concern in keeping two of them is
maintanance, not only code, but also docs.
If we are to replace Guththila with Musila at some point in time, then
it is no point that we take the effort and change the docs.
If that is the case, I propose that we put the code with Musila to
scratch till it gets mature.
Samisa...
Supun.
--
Samisa Abeysinghe : http://www.bloglines.com/blog/samisa
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
