On 6/14/07, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > > In line with what we already have with HTTP transport, I prefer the > prefix 'axis2_smtp_transport_' over 'axis2_mail_transport_', for the > function names. > > > Well, Mail Transport itself is a combination of two protocols (at > least) SMTP(sending Emails) and POP3(retrieving Emails). "sender" > prefix implies that we use SMTP and in the mail transport receiver > part is going to prefix with "receiver" prefix which implies that we > use POP3 (or IMAP). Oh yes, I forgot the POP part :( So it is sensible to stick to 'axis2_mail_transport_sender_' prefix for sender side. Do you plan to implement receiver side as well?
Yes if time enough to complete the first part (i.e. Mail Transport Sender) I will look into receiver part as well. Thanks for the comments. Regards, Rajika Samisa...
-- Samisa Abeysinghe : http://www.wso2.org/ (WSO2 Oxygen Tank - Web Services Developers' Portal) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- http://rajikacc.blogspot.com/
