> Hi, > I tried with the svn head and had no luck. :(. > The problem is still there. Seems the patch here[1] has already applied > to the head. > Can somebody shed some light on this? Is it necessary to re-open the issue?
I have corrected the issue and changes are in the svn head. That patch [1] wasn't completely applied to the head. One part was there and other part was missing. Anyway I have corrected the original problem (duplicating namespaces). I couldn't try it with Rampart samples (I have lot of changes in my rampart source and at the moment it is not compling -). Making guththila as the default parser may cause us few problems in the short terms. But it will definitely improve Guththila code and I think this is a good choice if we consider the long term issues like dependencies, efficiency, modifiebility etc. Most of the major bugs of Guththila are reported and some are corrected by now. So I don't think making Guththila as the default parser will cause any major issues. Regards, Supun... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
