> Bill, > > "Bill Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Dinesh, I noticed when I unzipped the 1.3 build that there was no >> guththila.dll, which implies to me that it was still built with libxml2 >> as the >> parser. As there are no open guththila Jira reports, I donât think >> there is >> any reason guththila canât be the default parser. Even though this >> was raised >> as a suggestion a month ago, my guess is that no one remembered, after >> all the >> issues were fixed, to go ahead and change over the default. > > I guess what we had was a discussion regarding make guththila default > parser, and no decisions made regarding that. Although all the issues > were fixed, lets give sometime to module implementers to play with > Guththila as the default parser. > >> Itâs probably too late at this point to switch, but I wanted to bring >> it to >> your attention. It may be that during the 1.3 development cycle, >> guththila >> actually received more use and testing than did the libxml >> interface. > Even though it was well tested with Axis2/C scenarios , I think > guththila is still didn't test much with other modules (like > Rampart/C, Sandesha/C, Savan/C etc). I would suggest to move forward > with making Guththila default parser after having feedback from other > module developers.
+1, Regards, Senaka > > thanks, > Dinesh > -- > http://nethu.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
