Kaushalye Kapuruge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > +1. But when it comes to submodule prefix, could this be a problem? > Say I need to use prefix > [rampart][oxs] for OMXMLSecurity and > [rampart][util] for Utility module etc. > Would that be a big issue if we give the freedom of passing the prefix?
Is this a standard that we are using [Module][Submodule] prefix ? For me [Module] prefix and file name and number is detailed enough :) Is there any advantage over logging submodule prefix? For Axis2/C logs, we didn't use any prefix so far. I think it is better to continue that for the future as well. thanks, Dinesh -- http://nethu.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
