I guess I do not have any problem putting in the change to allow UNKNOWN 
type to be passed in.  Will a few days to see if there are any objections.

Nadir K. Amra


Nicholas Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/19/2007 05:20:51 PM:

> that looks like the exact problem I'm seeing.  for the heck of it I 
> tried removing enforcement of the type checking in getElement() and it 
> seems to progress farther.  the problem I'm encountering now is that the 

> order of elements returned doesn't match the order in which the 
> generated stub tries to parse them--which is causing a different 
failure.
> 
> I can probably work around that by tweaking my stub code.
> 
> this is ugly, but here's the change I made to allow parsing to continue 
> if the node contains no type attribute (I'm not proposing this as a 
> change--it needs to be cleaned up so we don't call getXSDType twice on 
> the same node).
> 
> Index: soap/SoapDeSerializer.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- soap/SoapDeSerializer.cpp   (revision 497694)
> +++ soap/SoapDeSerializer.cpp   (working copy)
> @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@
>           if (0 == strcmp (pName, m_pNode->m_pchNameOrValue))
>               bNillFound = isNillValue();
> 
> -        if (bNillFound || isArrayElement || (pSimpleType->getType() == 
> getXSDType (m_pNode)))
> +        if (bNillFound || isArrayElement || (pSimpleType->getType() == 
> getXSDType (m_pNode)) || (getXSDType (m_pNode) == XSD_UNKNOWN))
>           {
>               m_pNode = m_pParser->next (true);   /* charactor node */
>               if (!m_pNode)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Nadir Amra wrote:
> > Nicholas,
> > 
> > I too am not sure if a type is required.  I need to do some 
investigation. 
> >  I know there is AXISCPP-830  that is related.  I will investigate, 
but if 
> > someone can look into this and let us know then a fix can be 
expedited. 
> > 
> > And if you can attach a sample wsdl and SOAP response, it will 
expedite a 
> > fix. 
> > 
> > Nadir K. Amra
> > 
> > 
> > Nicholas Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/19/2007 04:03:45 PM:
> > 
> > 
> >>I'm not having much luck with an axis2c client, so I've returned to 
> >>axiscpp--which I almost seem to have working.  I've built a debug 
> >>version from svn and I've verified that I receive a response from my 
> >>server (I can see it in ethereal and in 
> >>SoapBinInputStream::readBytes()), but when trying to parse the 
response, 
> > 
> > 
> >>SoapDeSerializer::getElementAsString() is failing.
> >>
> >>in my generated client stub, the call to "m_pCall->checkMessage()" 
> >>succeeds, so it does seem to receive the correct message in the 
> >>response.  however, m_pCall->getCmplxObject() fails, returning NULL. 
> >>Stepping into getCmplxObject() I see that when it tries to parse the 
> >>very first element (via pIWSDZ->getElementAsString()) it fails.
> >>the element it is trying to parse looks something like this:
> >>
> >><foo>some text here</foo>
> >>
> >>I would expect that it should return "some text here" but instead, it 
> >>fails.  I believe this is because inside 
SoapDeSerializer::getElement(), 
> > 
> > 
> >>it calls SoapDeSerializer::getXSDType() on the element (in this case, 
> >>"foo") and it fails, because the element has no attributes. 
XSD_UNKNOWN 
> > 
> > 
> >>is returned, and since it doesn't match XSD_STRING, getElement() 
fails. 
> >>  of course, the rest of the parsing fails since the status is set to 
an 
> > 
> > 
> >>error...
> >>
> >>since I'm not too familiar with how this is supposed to work I am 
> > 
> > wondering:
> > 
> >>1. is the server response bad (ie: should it be providing some 
> >>attributes on that node?)
> >>2. is the client configured incorrectly (ie: should it be able to 
parse 
> >>this, with the right settings somewhere?)
> >>3. is this a bug in the client that I should try to fix?
> >>
> >>thank you!
> >>
> >>PS: let me know if this should go on the dev list instead.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to