DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355

Type info in body is validated even if use=literal

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID



------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-02-17 02:57 -------
The xsi:type on your array element (i.e. <ConfigurationArray>) looks wrong, in 
a couple of different ways.

First of all, the schema in the WSDL specifies a "literal" collection, i.e. an 
element with maxOccurs="unbounded".  This being the case, the xsi:type of the 
ConfigurationArray element should, if anything, 
be "s0:ArrayOfCounfiguration".  SOAP encoded arrays shouldn't be anywhere in 
the picture here.

Second, even if SOAP-encoded arrays WERE in the picture, SOAP-ENC:arrayType is 
NOT a valid type - that qname is reserved for the arrayType attribute, which 
itself contains the qname of the array component type.

Marking this INVALID for now.  If you can reduce this to a valid test case 
which demonstrates a particular failing of Axis, please open another bug with 
that specific test.  Thanks!

Reply via email to