OK - the serialization is exactly the same, just the schema is a little different. I can't see this breaking anyone unless they're using really exacting XML mapping tools. +1 from me.
--Glen > -----Original Message----- > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Map/HashMap with .NET (was Re: cvs commit: > xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding/ser MapDeserializer.java > MapSerializer.java) > > > FYI. Ran "ant clean all-tests" :) > > --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 09:53 > > Subject: Map/HashMap with .NET (was Re: cvs commit: > > xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding/ser MapDeserializer.java > > MapSerializer.java) > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > Any objections to this check-in? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > dims > > > > well, it depends on what else it breaks. > > > > > ===== > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online > http://webhosting.yahoo.com >
