All good questions....Let me see if i can get access to the JAX-RPC TCK. Please add your comments to bugzilla so that they don't get lost.
-- dims --- Michael Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys- > This bug hasn't been touched in a while, so I was wondering if > anyone has looked at it recently. > > Just curious, but if this fix broke the TCK, how was code that > is generated incorrectly passing the TCK? If the generated SOAP doesn't > match the WSDL, how is that getting through the TCK? > > Thanks for the help, > > Mike Ryan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 3:17 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: JAX-RPC TCK - Axis 1.1 > > > > Continuing in our discussion of how "reproducible" the TCK results are, > this bug fix in 1.1 actually broke several TCK tests. > > Upon having our testers 'start from scratch' and re-run the test, it > turns out we DO have failures. Don't blame me; I just pass along what > they tell me. :-( > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Macromedia Server Development > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 4:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18287] - Error in serialization of > xsd:boolean fields > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18287>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18287 > > Error in serialization of xsd:boolean fields > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED > Resolution|FIXED | > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-07 20:13 > ------- Dims, This change broke things. WSDL2Java now no longer converts > <element name="nilint" type="xsd:int" nillable="true"/> > > To an Integer, but rather an int. > > We need to solve this another way and correctly map nillable=true xsd > types to > their Java wrappers. > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
