DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22411>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22411 Client session objects are shared by a multiple call object Summary: Client session objects are shared by a multiple call object Product: Axis Version: current (nightly) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: Other Component: Basic Architecture AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If a user application creates two call objects from one service object with setMaintainSession(true), all of session info (including ids, objects) are shared among the two client unintentionally. Expected combination: [ JVM : Service ojb ] = one-to-many [ Service obj : Call obj ] = one-to-many [ User app : Call obj ] = one-to-many .........*.........*.........*.........*.........*.........*.........* +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ 4th Layer | User app-1 | | User app-2 | | User app-3 | +------+-----+ +------+-----+ +-----+------+ +-------------+ | | | | | | +------+-----+ +-----+------+ +------+-----+ +------+-----+ 3rd Layer |Call obj.A-1| |Call obj.A-2| |Call obj.B-1| |Call obj.B-2| +------+-----+ +-----+------+ +------+-----+ +------+-----+ | | | | +------+-------------+------+ +------+-------------------+ 2nd Layer | Service obj. A | | Service obj. B | +---------------------------+ +--------------------------+ +--------------------------------------------------------+ 1st Layer | JVM (Java Virtual Machine) | +--------------------------------------------------------+ .........*.........*.........*.........*.........*.........*.........* - The 1st Layer will be coverd by System.setProperty("javax.xml.rpc.session.maintain","true/false"). - The 2nd Layer will be coverd by service.setMaintainSession(true/false). - The 3nd Layer will be coverd by call.setMaintainSession(true/false). Finally, the order of priority would be better off processing "3rd layer" -> "2nd layer" -> "1st layer". Thanks, Toshi (Toshiyuki Kimura) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R&D Headquarters NTT DATA Corporation
