[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1757?page=comments#action_58898 ]
     
Jongjin Choi commented on AXIS-1757:
------------------------------------

This issue is addressed in 'Backward Compatibility' section of Xerces-J home 
page and DOM Level 2 errata. 
(http://www.w3.org/2000/11/DOM-Level-2-errata#core-26).

According to that, I think, it is legal that the user specify null instead of 
"" as first parameter of getAttributeNS and the result should be same in both 
case.
 
I think that the patch is reasonable.


> AXIS XML interface does not conform to expected DOM behavior
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: AXIS-1757
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1757
>      Project: Axis
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: Basic Architecture
>     Versions: 1.2
>  Environment: all platforms (mine is Windows 2000/XP), JDK 1.4.2_06
>     Reporter: Jeroen van Bemmel
>  Attachments: bug-1757.txt
>
> The AXIS implementation of some DOM interfaces (in particular: 
> ws-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/message/MessageElement.java method 
> getAttributeNS) does not behave as expected for DOM. In one case this caused 
> a WSS4J getCanonicalizerMethod() to fail (don't remember the exact signature 
> or file), since it uses 'null' as a first parameter (namespace).
> As can be seen in Xerces-J NamedNodeMapImpl (method protected int 
> findNamePoint(String namespaceURI, String name) ) a first parameter of 'null' 
> should skip a check on namespace, and simply return any node with a matching 
> localname or nodename.
> Since MessageElement implements SOAPElement which extends Element, one would 
> expect the behavior to conform. Or am I missing something here?
> JvB

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to