1) if the module is just a packaing of the Handler for usability
purposes am +1 for name it blocks
2) I think Module is littel bit more than that, for an example I would
like to have ability to have Service ref a module and have it enabled
as the j2ee does.
e.g.
<service name="foo">
<module ref="Authentication"/>
</service>
then the service foo has the authentication enabled.
In the context of #2 I feel module make more sense .. thoughts?
Thanks
Srianth
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:43:09 -0500, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we call them "blocks"? (instead of modules?)
>
> -- dims
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
