Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
"Aleksander Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
StAX RI code is under Apache License V2 and the latest source code is in codehaus SVN.
Oh, so what's in codehaus is just the BEA implemented RI?
hi,
StAX RI code is based on XPP3 and is under Apache License ASF v2 - however actual StAX JSR-173 API (jsr173_1.0_api.jar) which is @author "Copyright (c) 2003 by BEA Systems. All Rights Reserved." has a different license (AFAIK) and is also in codehaus SVN repository (src100/ contains original version and src/ current version with RI bug fixes - this or slightly older version is also in codehaus maven repository): see http://svn.stax.codehaus.org/trunk/dev/
this i admit is confusing and i have never understood that part of JCP process that resulted in this - i wish i could point to some place that explain it (such confusions are not good for long term StAX future)
it would be nice if all source code had:
/* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
but currently source code is a mixed bag though majority of code is under ASF v2 AFAIK.
if somebody can shed more light on that ...
thanks,
alek
-- The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
