FYI
alek
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [stax_builders] [axis2] StAX API and RI license? Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:16:11 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure, I'll try to put some official statement together.
-C --- Tatu Saloranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Chris Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess I think it's a plus that the API is a > standard > and endorsed by Sun. This provides backwards > compatibility garuntees etc. The RI is available > under the apache license and the API is freely > distributable but not modifiable.
Chris, would it be possible to document this somewhere? That is, that API is philosophically "read-only public domain"... My thinking is that if it's not adequately explained, the default expectation is that copyright holder has the full authority over copying of that jar (which is not the intention).
-+ Tatu +-
> > -Chris
> > > > > --- Aleksander Slominski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > > > >"Aleksander Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > writes:
> > > > > >
> > >>StAX RI code is under Apache License V2 and
the
> > latest source code is in > > >>codehaus SVN.
> > >> > > >>
> > >
> > >Oh, so what's in codehaus is just the BEA
> > implemented RI?
> > > > > >
> > hi,
> > > > StAX RI code is based on XPP3 and is under
Apache
> > License ASF v2 - > > however actual StAX JSR-173 API
> (jsr173_1.0_api.jar)
> > which is @author > > "Copyright (c) 2003 by BEA Systems. All Rights
> > Reserved." has a > > different license (AFAIK) and is also in
codehaus
> > SVN repository > > (src100/ contains original version and src/
> current
> > version with RI bug > > fixes - this or slightly older version is also
in
> > codehaus maven > > repository): see
> > http://svn.stax.codehaus.org/trunk/dev/
> > > > this i admit is confusing and i have never
> > understood that part of JCP > > process that resulted in this - i wish i could
> point
> > to some place that > > explain it (such confusions are not good for
long
> > term StAX future)
> > > > it would be nice if all source code had:
> > > > /* Licensed under the Apache License, Version
> 2.0
> > (the "License");
> > * you may not use this file except in
> compliance
> > with the License.
> > * You may obtain a copy of the License at
> > *
> > * > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > *
> > * Unless required by applicable law or agreed
> to
> > in writing, software
> > * distributed under the License is
distributed
> on
> > an "AS IS" BASIS,
> > * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
KIND,
> > either express or > > implied.
> > * See the License for the specific language
> > governing permissions and
> > * limitations under the License.
> > */
> > > > but currently source code is a mixed bag though
> > majority of code is > > under ASF v2 AFAIK.
> > > > if somebody can shed more light on that ...
> > > > thanks,
> > > > alek
> > > > -- > > The best way to predict the future is to invent
it
> -
> > Alan Kay
> > > > > > >
> __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources
site!
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ >
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stax_builders/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-- The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
