Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a committer


Deepal.


Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is
good and it integrates with OM smoothly.

So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area.

And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer.

-- Chinthaka

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch

Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support?
The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were
multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete
realization.

In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer?

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch


> Hi dims,
> Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main
> area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM
> representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the scratch
> area for the time being.
> (Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the
> first place :))
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area?
> >
> > -- dims
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thilina.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >
>
>
> --
> Ajith Ranabahu
>











Reply via email to