Hi all, Some of the guys here in the summit try to be in the IRC.
Network : irc.freenode.org, channel : #apache-axis So you can actively participate in the summit thru that. And my self, and some others try level best to be online in Yahoo and Skype. -- Chinthaka > -----Original Message----- > From: Shawn Dahlen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:11 AM > To: Jaliya Ekanayake > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Axis2]A Proposal for the messaged based Axis2 core > > Jaliya - > > Just got a chance to begin reading the proposal (noticed that it was > slightly different than the document in the toy engine Srinath and you > put together). I wish I could reply in full now, but alas I need to > catch some shut eye. My work has granted me tomorrow and next day to > collaborate, so I will spend tomorrow reviewing the proposal (and > anything else you guys might put together at the conference). > > At first glance, I like the direction. A few questions. > > 1. What does the "Message" look like? > 2. Is WSA information burnt into the "Message" much like in Indigo? > 3. What does the client programming model(s) look like, this proposal > seems to be directed more at the internals, correct? > 4. Interesting use of the MessageContext, I'll have to think about > that. What happened to the MessageBus concept? > 5. At the messaging level, I do not believe a contract (ala WSDL) > should be necessary. The contract between the parties is implicit (or > the developers looked up a document / WSDL? to see the messages > required for communication). The service model of course would > generate the appropriate proxies based on the service descriptor > (WSDL). Is the opinion of others at the conference? > > I do apologize for my inability to help share ideas quickly on this > topic. Always tough trying to find that spare time :) > > - Shawn > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:39:55 +0600, Jaliya Ekanayake > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Shawn and All, > > > > > > > > I have suggested few changes to Axis2 core with the aim of supporting > more > > message based services. The proposal is sent in the attachment. > > > > I would be interested in hearing your thoughts. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jaliya > >
