Jaya, team, Good job! remember eventually, you have to "load" the xml and then "save" the xml and then compare the 2 xml's using say the xmlunit stuff.
thanks, dims On Apr 7, 2005 2:48 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "jayachandra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Our team here tested to see where our current OM implementation stands > > on the w3c xml test suite conformance and found out that, of the 2500 > > odd sample XMLs given there, around 490 are getting properly parsed > > without any excpetions getting thrown. > > WOW! Outstanding OM guys :-). > > Jaya, thanks for doing this!! > > > The rest of the files are > > failing because most of them contained the unsupported DTD, PI and > > Comment element types in them. XML Infoset spec requires > > implementation for these three types as well. Comment elements appear > > manageable and I was successful in implementing (just a rough work > > though) them. But the rest two seem slightly complex to me. Any > > ideas/suggestions/pointers, helping hands interested in taking this > > forward? > > We discussed this at the F2F and agreed that while OM fully > supporting all of XML was a "nice to have" feature, it was not > something that was in the critical path for v1.0 because XML that > comes over SOAP will not have that stuff. > > Now, that is not to say that if this is something you want to work > on, of course, please do! Maybe its not even very hard; StAX > probably does most of the hard work for it. > > Sanjiva. > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
