Hi Glen; On 5/4/05, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) I still like OperationContext WAY better than MEPContext. When did > we decide on MEPContext? WSDL calls them "operations".... Consider > this a request to change it back, or at least VOTE on it.
let me say Bit of histry how we end up here :) We use to have both OperationContext and MEPcontext, OperationContext - info for one operation across the lifetime of the operation MEPContext - ino for single message exchange, OperationContext has number of MEP context stored in it. Then we put the information in the OperationContext to the AxisOperation and get rid of Operation context. Changing current MEPContext -> OperationContext might be wrong as it is about all "instance" of MEP, in that sense the name MEPContext is wrong too .. the mep context is about a "intraction" rather than "interaction pattern". Actually now I do mind less about the exact naming than, changing the name too often and I had to refactor and do the fixing ;) Thanks Srinath
