+1 On 6/27/05, jayachandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/27/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:52 +0530, jayachandra wrote: > > > No. OMDocument is a class > > > > ?? How come? OmElement is an interface so why isn't this?? > It was so since inception. May be as part of the ongoing refactoring > we can have an interface OMDocument and a seperate Implementation > class say OMDocumentImpl.java > Even going by the infoset spec, we might want to have an interface for > OMDocument, just the way we had it for OMElement, OMAttribute etc. > > Jaya > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Jaya >
-- Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
