+1, especially with MTOM this is absolutely perfect to have! Sanjiva.
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 09:05 -0700, Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > +1! > > On 6/28/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Absolutely critical!!!!!!!!!!! Both of them (large attachments AND > > performance) > > > > On 6/28/05, Thilina Gunarathne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > With the recent experiences i got while trying to integrate attachment > > > stuff > > > to Axis 2, I'm kinda of getting the feeling like attachments are a *not* > > > so > > > important thing for Web Services...... > > > Since my knowledge about practicle web services world is low, can somebody > > > clarify me on the above matter and the key factors that we have to look > > > when > > > providing attachment support (eg: Ability to handle large attachments vs > > > performance....)....... > > > > > > thanks & regards, > > > ~Thilina > > > > > > "May the SourcE be with u" > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/ > > >
