Hi Chatura; I do not think we should support this senario!, to me we are doing better error detecting! Thanks Srinath
On 7/6/05, Chathura Herath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Ok I just looked at the wsdl and sorry for the delay. Adding the target > namespace simply fix the problem. Pls try with the attached WSDL. Don't > think this is a bug rather an error in the WSDL. I am not so sure how they > do it in Axis though. > > Are we gonna support this scenario?? > > Chathura Herath > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:32 PM > > To: Venkat Reddy > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Axis2] Code Emitter Broken? > > > > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 11:00 +0530, Venkat Reddy wrote: > > > The WSDL works with Axis 1.2.1. Namespace for "testType" is taken as > > > "http://test.wsdl";. For example, the generated stub code has this line > > > : > > > param = new org.apache.axis.description.ParameterDesc(new > > > javax.xml.namespace.QName("", "testParam"), > > > org.apache.axis.description.ParameterDesc.IN, new > > > javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://test.wsdl";, "testType"), > > > wsdl.test.TestType.class, false, false); > > > > Why does it take that namespace? If a schema is declared without a > > target namespace then it doesn't have a namespace .. you can't take the > > default namespace of the enclosing element as the namespace for which > > the schema is defined. > > > > So basically if the schema doesn't have a "targetNamespace" attribute > > then that schema cannot be used in WSDL. IIRC WSDL 1.1 didn't spell this > > out explicitly but it was clarified in the WS-I basic profile: > > > > http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08- > > 24.html#Schema_targetNamespace_Structure > > > > WSDL 2.0 also clarifies this by declaring this attribute mandatory: > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#xsd-types > > > > This a bug in Axis1. > > > > Of course, a better error message from Axis2 would be appreciated by > > users I'm sure :-). > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > >
