+1 On 7/26/05, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all: > > I just noticed that our EndpointReference class has this field which doesn't > make any sense. An EndpointReference is just that, an EPR. The fact that a > given EPR happens to be a wsa:To header, or a myNS:Whatever header, does not > matter to the type itself, and therefore this field should not be in the > base class. If it becomes imporant to carry this information, the correct > way to do it (IMHO) would be to have an addressing.ToHeader type which > extended EndpointReference. > > Also, NOTHING except EndpointReferenceTypeTest uses it right now. > > I'm going to refactor it out....ok? > > --Glen > >
-- Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
