Jaya, Please log this as a bug.
thanks, dims On 7/28/05, jayachandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attaching the wsdl used for creating artifacts with WSDL2Java > > Jaya > > On 7/28/05, jayachandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > I planned to test a stub based style of invocation with this wsdl > > [attached below- SimpleTest.wsdl]. > > Its the wsdl for a webservice which hosts a method of the signature > > public String echoString(String inputString); > > I started with wsdl2java to generate stubs for me. I then set out to > > write a test client (this was lacking from wsdl2java artifacts that > > got generated) that would just assume as if it was invoking a local > > method named echoString on the stub. Strangely the method signature of > > echoString(..) in the generated stub is seen to expect an XMLBeans > > specific EchoStringDocument kind of object as its input parameter. > > This makes us think that data binding is not facilitated to the user > > fully. User shouldn't have to bore the onus of creating an > > EchoStringDocument object and pass it as parameter to the stub method, > > at least when he is using the stub based invocation, isn't it? Is this > > feature on our wish list or am I missing something!?! > > > > Thank you > > Jayachandra > > -- > > -- Jaya > > > > > -- > -- Jaya > > > -- Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
