+1
On 8/3/05, Chathura Herath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Glen, > > This was the initial parser that I wrote get the tool working. It remained > to this date. > I am very much +1 for using either commons or Axis1. Personally would like > to get the Axis1 code rather than to (if??)increase the jar dependencies. > > Yup let us try not to alienate the Axis1 users if they are going to try out > Axis2. > > Chathura > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:13 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser > > > > Hey all: > > > > First off, what do people think about having the WSDL2Java command line > > a little more like Axis 1's? In particular, I'd like to be able to just > > do: > > > > # wsdl2Java myService.wsdl > > > > ...and have it work. This means that the "-uri" option would go away, > > and everything else would default reasonably. > > > > Second, can someone explain to me why we wrote a new command line > > parser? There is one in Jakarta commons, there is one in Axis 1... why > > didn't we just use one of those? > > > > --Glen > > > >
