On 8/10/05, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I definitely agree that start-from-Java can be very useful, Robert. I'm > planning to work on adding support for my JiBX data binding framework > (http://www.jibx.org) to Axis2, starting after the next release.
would that be the next Axis2 release or JiBX release? > I think JiBX is one of the nicest start-from-Java frameworks around, though > it's > also being extended to better support start-from-schema. AIUI JiBX is known primarily as a generative start-from-java binder (though now i've dug a little, i've found that it also supports dynamic binding). i had in mind a dynamic approach which is why i suggested xstream. (JiBX and xstream are - in my mind - third generation approaches with better architectures more suitable for axis 2 than the second generation ones.) i'm convinced that start-from-java is a small but vital part of the web service ecology and think it's unfortunate the advantages of the third generation binders are not more widely know. in some ways, i think it's a small but crucial cog in the axis2 machine: delivering support for poor schemas and quicker prototyping by java-centric developers. do you plan to work on the proposed module here or over sourceforge? - robert
