FWIW, from what i remember i think Axis 1.x does that as well as xmlspy. On 8/24/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok. but anyways the bottom line is the wsdl in question (wsrf) is a > valid wsdl with a valid schema and we should not fail. > > -- dims > > On 8/24/05, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dims, you can only do that if WSDL says that's what you do (otherwise > > it's not interoperable, or correct according to schema). > > > > I don't see the problem Sanjiva is worried about, though. If the > > elements are unqualified, then the references are simply unqualified as > > well... <input element="foo"/> instead of <input element="ns:foo"/> - > > what's the big deal? > > > > --G > > > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > Ajith, > > > > > > In Axis 1.X and elsewhere, people default to wsdl's targetNamespace. > > > can't we do that instead? > > > > > > -- dims > > > > > > On 8/24/05, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Hi Dims, > > >> I actually discussed this with Sanjiva after going through the specs. > > >> He's > > >>in the view that the schema defined in the WSDL needs to have the > > >>targetNamespace attribute even though it is not mandatory according to the > > >>schema spec. The reason is that if the elements are unqualified then the > > >>messages section might have a problem refering to the elements.These facts > > >>do not seem to be documented anywhere :( > > >> However I feel Jaya's solution seems to be valid since it serves the > > >> WSDL's > > >>purpose! > > >> > > >> Thoughts ? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>On 8/24/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >>>check the xsd schema's schema. if it is mandatory then throw exception > > >>>if it is absent otherwise don't. > > >>> > > >>>-- dims > > >>> > > >>>On 8/24/05, jayachandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>>Ajith! > > >>>>If the content inside the <xsd:schema> element is(are) just an import > > >>>>statement(s) then, I guess, there need not be a targetNamespace. > > >>>>However if any information other than import elements appear (viz. > > >>>>element declarations, include statements etc.) then we should throw > > >>>>that exception. Just my thought, though > > >>>> > > >>>>Thank you > > >>>>Jayachandra > > >>>> > > >>>>On 8/24/05, Ajith Ranabahu < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>>Hi all, > > >>>>>the following piece of WSDL is from the WSRF WSDL at > > >>>>>http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/rpw-1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>><wsdl:types> > > >>>>> <xsd:schema> > > >>>>> <xsd:import > > >>>>> namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/rp-1 " > > >>>>> schemaLocation=" > > >>>> > > >>>>http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/rp-1"; /> > > >>>> > > >>>>> </xsd:schema> > > >>>>> </wsdl:types> > > >>>>>Axis2 code generator is configured to throw an exception if it > > >> > > >>encounters a > > >> > > >>>>>schema element that does not declare a target namespace. Is that > > >> > > >>correct in > > >> > > >>>>>this case ? > > >>>>>-- > > >>>>>Ajith Ranabahu > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>-- > > >>>>-- Jaya > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>-- > > >>>Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service > > >>>Platform > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>-- > > >>Ajith Ranabahu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform >
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
