Chinthaka, Dennis, Sure, got it. I'll continue looking at the XBIS code and let you know what I can do.
Thanks, Mark On 8/25/05, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oops, Denis, sorry for the confusion. My fault. > > Mark, here we go.... > > -- EC > > Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > > > I think there was some confusion over this, Chinthaka. I said in the > > chat that I'd be implementing StAX support for JiBX, and that I'd try > > JibxSoap support for XBIS - not that I'd add StAX support for XBIS. > > I'll still probably add StAX support for XBIS at some point if Mark > > isn't able to do it, but it's definitely not a priority for me at this > > time. > > > > - Dennis > > > > Eran Chinthaka wrote: > > > >> Hi Mark, > >> > >> Today, in our weekly chat, Dennis expressed his willingness to > >> integrate XBIS binary stuff with Axis2. So I think u don't need to do > >> that. Anway, Denis is the one who wrote it so he knows in and out of > >> XBIS than anyone. > >> But at the same time Axis2 team wanted to have some other impl of > >> binary stuff in to Axis2. So you still have some more space to > >> contribute. > >> > >> -- Chinthaka > >> > >> Mark Pimentel wrote: > >> > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> Chinthaka and I will likely move forward with trying to implement a > >>> StAX parser for Dennis' XBIS format for Axis2, instead of sticking > >>> with DFDL. Does that sound reasonable to everyone? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Mark > >>> > >>> On 8/16/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 07:01 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 12:16 -0700, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'll just refer back to our earlier discussion on this topic: > >>>>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=112131569306784&w=2 ;-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Dennis > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 to using some XML Infoset binary serialization format rather than > >>>>> DFDL. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I forgot to mention .. I would like to introduce a typed pull API > >>>> (extending StAX) into Axis2 (and implement it the obvious way). When > >>>> data binding is in place and if the data is being serialized, for > >>>> non-string data this can make a big difference. A common use case is > >>>> using Axis2 to deal with large numerical data sets .. if we go with a > >>>> binary typed stax approach, there's no intrinsic reason that should be > >>>> any slower or memory intensive than any other binary protocol > >>>> approach. > >>>> > >>>> After v1.0, of course ;-). > >>>> > >>>> Sanjiva. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > >
