Hi, Is this similer to SOAP Encoding. I mean type mapping with XML and java objects.? I'm going to work with SOAP encoding . Any Input i can get from this.?
BR, Manoj On 8/26/05, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > > > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > >> <snip> > >> > >> > >> i've been playing around with some code for a day or two > >> (http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/tool.html). it's just hacked > >> together but hopefully it'll serve as an illustration and act as a > >> lightning rod for ideas. (it'll try to explain where i see it fitting > >> into the bigger picture later.) so please criticise the concepts not > >> the coding :) > >> > >> > > Looks very cool to me, Robert! It'd be easy to translate your > > <class-model> structure into JiBX binding terms, too. > > > > I've thought about the issue of sample instances you mention on the > > page, but don't have any good answers. It'd be easy to do something > > for simple bean/struct classes - but that breaks down when you get to > > complex structures (think hashmaps, for instance). Allowing serialized > > instances to be loaded is the only thing I can think of that will work > > over a wide range of objects. Or perhaps unmarshalling an XML document > > to create instances? That way people could generate an initial XML and > > start editing it, then have the changes reflected in the object state. > > I think editing the initial XML then marshalling it is probably the best > way. Although I'm not convinced that something more than sample values > are needed to see what the XML looks like. > > If this tool is integrated tightly with an IDE there are probably some > good components that we could leverate to allow inspection of types like > HashMaps or beans. > > - Dan > > -- > Dan Diephouse > Envoi Solutions LLC > http://netzooid.com > > -- use the FORCE read the SOURCE www.linux.lk
