Eran Chinthaka wrote:

hang on, I'm not allowing you to escape like that :).

I just did a small fix to the code now. Can u please check whether your non-blocking scenario with separate listeners runs now ? Thilina also had the same problem.

-- Chinthaka

jayachandra wrote:

Yes guys!
the application i was testing erroneously set its useSeperateListener to true. I've changed it, and things are running fine now. Thanks for all your help! Bye
Jaya
On 9/2/05, *Eran Chinthaka* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Hi Jaya,

    Please see my comments below.

    jayachandra wrote:

    > Hi!
    >
    > When I invoked a call.invokeBlocking() routine, internally it is
    > simulated using invokeNonBlocking() using a call back mechanism.

    invokeBlocking() will use invokeNonBlocking() if you send and receive
    using two different instances of transports. In the other case,
    meaning
    when you use the same transport to send and receive, we are not using
    invokeNonBlocking() for invokeBlocking case. Just a small
    clarification ;).

    Regards,
    Chinthaka





--
-- Jaya

Chinthaka is right. Even when you set to use duel channel your code should work. But make sure if you are using invokeBlocking() or invokeNonBloking() with duel channel, for the time being not to call "call.close()". It will cause the trouble.

Saminda

Reply via email to