+1 on breaking out the war and binary download and slimming down the
kit.

I would like to keep WS-Security support in the primary Axis2 distro.  I
think it is very valuable to have this support 'out of the box' as a
selling point for Axis, similar to its support of WS-Addressing.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 1:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (AXIS2-249) Exessive number & size of
> filesgenerated from WSDL
> 
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 22:33 -0700, Simon Fell wrote:
> > Other fun facts & figures, the axis binary download weights in at
> > 33Mb, compared to 24Mb for the entire .NET 1.1 runtime installer.
> 
> That's absolutely pathetic and unacceptable :(.
> 
> So let's start pairing this down:
> 
> - let's move the security module to WSS4J and release that separately?
> Let folks download that separately (we can point to that too but its
not
> reasonable to include that in the base)
> 
> - the way we're packaging now, there are 2+ copies of every jar file
in
> the binary dist:
>       - one copy in the lib/ directory
>       - another copy in the webapps/META-INF/lib directory
>       - for all the security stuff (I was going to say junk but I
> restrained
> myself ;-)) inside the mar file as well
> 
> - we are also dist'ing 2 copies of all the mars
>       - one copy in the webapp
>       - one copy outside the webapp
> 
> I'd like to separate the webapp into a separate download from the base
> binary distribution. Can we think of a creative way to package the
admin
> war separately?
> 
> We need to do some serious refactoring of the build and dist stuff.
> 
> Sanjiva.

Reply via email to