[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-235?page=comments#action_12331089 ]
Eran Chinthaka commented on AXIS2-235: -------------------------------------- Can the RM IN handler itself send the ack, without asking the message receiver to send it, without making the existing MEP much more complex ?. I'm definitely -1 if default INOnlyMessageReceiver tries to send a response. IMO, that is the best way to do it. If that helps, can you please resolve this issue also. > A module should be able to add a response message within the InFlow > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AXIS2-235 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-235 > Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2) > Type: New Feature > Reporter: Chamikara Jayalath > > Suppose the user has deployed a Ping Service (with a one-way ping operation) > and RM module is deployed. Only the RMHandlers of the in path get called > (since the user has set an InOnly message receiver). The RM module may want > to send an acknowledgement message as response instead of simply sending 202. > So the RMHandlers of the InFlow should be able to set this message beforehand. > One way to do this is making AbstractInMessageReceiver more flexible. If a > response message has been set in the OperationContext (by a handler in the > InFlow) the AbstractInMessageReceiver has to work as an InOut message > receiver and it should send this message. > Or is there a better way? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
