Steve, You should be all set now.
Steps: - Fetch latest SVN - Create a project.properties in root directory ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- optional.includes= ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Drop latest xalan jar in jdk15\jre\lib\endorsed - Run "maven clean all-tests" Thanks, dims PS: Ruchith can decide about DOM2/DOM3 later when he gets a chance. On 10/28/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > I've moved the dom stuff out of the way and made the saaj build > optional. Now looking at test failures in JDK1.5 > > thanks, > -- dims > > On 10/28/05, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, Ruchith ;-) , > > > > > > Ruchith Fernando wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > The DOM impl that we have in the xml module implements the OM > > interfaces. Therefore I included it under > > org.apache.axis2.om.impl.dom.* > > And I expected this to be used the same way we would use the llom > > implementation of OM. (The linked list implementation of OM goes under > > org.apache.axis2.om.impl.llom.*). > > > > But if you guys feel that the DOM stuff doesn't belong in the XML > > module please feel free to (re?)move it :-). > > remove it ? No way. Lets move it. We really need that. > > > > But I'd still like to > > have a clean impl which implements DOM and OM interfaces. > > > > +1. > > > > > > Thanks > > Ruchith > > > > On 10/28/05, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Steve Loughran wrote: > > > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > > > > > Should we break out the DOM2/DOM3 stuff from xml module? just like we > > did for saaj? > > > > > > well, the issue is that both the OMElement and the SAAJ stuff declare > > that they implement the dom interfaces, and you cannot build them on > > java1.5 without marking every impl class as abstract. So I dont think > > 'breaking out' is something > > we can do. > > > > This is COMPLETELY wrong idea. OM has nothing to do with dom impl. > > > > Actually I wanted to point this out earlier, but since Ruchith is doing > > some important stuff, I kept quiet. I don't think dom impl stuff belongs > > to OM. Its an extension of OM. This has made people to comment wrong on > > OM, which Steve just did. > > > > As Dims stated, its better if we can strip this out from OM. > > > > -- Chinthaka > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ruchith > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
