OK ..let us go with the wrapper for the time been
I will use that for my work at IU, hopefully I can diliver it quickly
:) ..defintly before next release.
Thanks
Srinath
On 12/6/05, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Srinath Perera wrote:
>
> >What I thought is something like this
> >
> >1. Call keep a instance of a MEPClient inside it and call the methods
> >providing a nicer interface (e.g. OMElement instead of MessageContext)
> >
> >
> Now also we have methods that returns OMElement instead of MessageContext.
>
> >2. Call have a new Call(MEPClient){ ..} constructer that allow the
> >user to create a Call (have a nicer interface) that wrap his MEP
> >Client. Plus Call has old constructors which will create a MEPClient
> >inside it.
> >
> >
> >
> I'm still not convinced with the argument :-) . BTW, why can't we have
> a special wrapper class for that.
>
> Anyway, I like the idea you try to implement. Hope we can get it before
> 1.0 :-)
>
> -- Chinthaka
>
