yes, it will work. -- dims
On 12/6/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 19:09 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Eran, > > > > Found a way to make us both happy. Supports your scenario w/o making > > copies of stuff and fixes the 2 problems reported by me. > > > > Please take a look at the xsl's and Options.java and let me know. > > > > It's very easy to revert back if needed, all you have to do is replace: > > org.apache.axis2.client.Options _options = new > > org.apache.axis2.client.Options(_clientOptions); > > > > with > > org.apache.axis2.client.Options _options = _clientOptions; > > We have a pending refactoring to share one instance of a Call per stub > instance. Doing that is critical as without that we can't do HTTP cookie > sessions for example. > > When we do that, does your solution still work? So we'd basically have a > single Options instance per stub. Then even if you create a local one in > each method and set that to the call inside the method (which is fine), > any settings on the global one will affect the local one as well. Maybe > I'm not seeing the logic correctly .. ? > > Sanjiva. > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
