+1 to JIRA-it. patches in emails get corrupted as well. So it's better to use JIRA and we need to ask them to zip up the text as well.
thanks, dims On 1/3/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > We are getting some good patches these days. Its a good sign for the > project. But I feel its not good to send emails to the group attaching > the patch to that email. I think there are lots and lots of people > subscribed to the dev list and that patch is getting copied to each > and every inbox. But ultimately that patch will be applied by one person. > So isn't it good to create a JIRA from that patch and send out a mail > to the dev list giving link to that JIRA. I think this will avoid > un-necessary overhead. > Personally, I'm ok with any means of sending patch. But I think its > unfair for some people who are helping us. So what do you all think ? > > Chinthaka > > P.S. Please do not consider this as a criticism for patches. I really > wanna get patches and I can help them in any means. I'm just thinking > loud to be reasonable for everyone. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFDup5wjON2uBzUhh8RAnhUAJ9yyqwwy+FlEgfrypvDWwSsq61YRQCeL5EB > aK6VoRWvZpJ0WcerZivuMUE= > =s4So > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
