On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 23:54 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Deepal, > > If people have multiple wsdl's with concrete/abstract wsdls and > imports between them, then we will run into problems. no?
I have to think about this a bit more but I think that we can flatten the schema/message/portType part of the original WSDL(s) into a new WSDL and save that and get away with it. We should, of course, default to saving the original WSDL as-is if its import-free and probably an option to do that if the user wishes (maybe the imports will resolve at runtime too). If we store stuff in services.xml or a new serialization of WOM (which I'd be much opposed to), we'll effectively be doing the same as the option of creating a new WSDL and storing it .. so I can't immediately see a reason why it will not work. But need to apply more neurons to it. Sanjiva.
