[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-371?page=comments#action_12362294 ]
Sanka Samaranayake commented on AXIS2-371: ------------------------------------------ In AxisServiceBuilder we had two options on how to process the given WSDL document. Using wsdl4j IMO gave a cleaner API to get all requried information and it was a lossless conversion from wsdl to wsdl4j object model. On the other hand if we had used the WOM instead of wsdl4j, then we would have lost certain information requried (for instance, wsp:Policy elements defined as child elements in wsdl:message elements) Since we are intend to use wooden in future (as it becomes available), its better if we spend less time in improving WOM as we are going to throw it way, and minimize its use in Axis2 framework. > AxisServiceBuilder should be using WOM not WSDL4J > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AXIS2-371 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-371 > Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2) > Type: Bug > Reporter: Davanum Srinivas > > Can we please standarding the WOM as the single representation for holding > information from either WSDL1 or WSDL2? AxisServiceBuilder bypasses the WOM > and uses wsdl4j directly. > thanks, > dims -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
