[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-397?page=comments#action_12363073 ]
Davanum Srinivas commented on AXIS2-397: ---------------------------------------- In fact we should even take the additional step of allowing method signatures in the allowedMethods as documented here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1489 and here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-976 > allowedMethods in services.xml > ------------------------------ > > Key: AXIS2-397 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-397 > Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2) > Type: Bug > Reporter: Davanum Srinivas > > We need to add an allowedMethods parameter in services.xml just like Axis1 > has. > Quoting Deepal: > Service Operations > There was a mail thread in the mailing list about that topic and we came to > conclusion that , we are going to display all the public method in the > service impl class. And using services.xml user can override or add > parameters to those operation. IF there is a wsdl in META-INF then all the > operations in the portType will be published and user can override them > using services.xml. > its implemented . So if the service impl class is implement in Java then it > is not require to have any operation tag in services.xml unless user want to > override something. > But I think we need to improve that , meaning user should be able to control > the operation that he need to expose , currently user dose not have any > control over that and all the public methods in service impl class will be > exposed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
