+1 and nice wording Eran On 1/31/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ok, then let me start on this. > > (Our beloved AXIOM is going away from Axis2 to a new home ;( ) > > - -- Chinthaka > > > Srinath Perera wrote: > > > Nice to hear it Jeremy! +1, lets separate it :) Thanks Srinath > > > > On 1/31/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> +1. let's do it :) > >> > >> -- dims > >> > >> On 1/31/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Paul Fremantle wrote: > >>> > >>>> I think there is more benefit to this than just the > >>>> WS-Policy. > >>>> > >>>> For example, AXIOM could be used by any of a number of > >>>> projects that need a lazily-built tree. In Synapse, we use > >>>> AXIOM extensively just to parse our config. And also, > >>>> although Synapse has a heavy dependency on Axis2, the core > >>>> model of Synapse was built to only depend on AXIOM. So I > >>>> think this is worth doing now. > >>>> > >>>> It also seems to me that Axiom is pretty stable, which > >>>> motivates it. > >>>> > >>>> But I agree, Dims, if that was the only reason, then it would > >>>> be simple to fix. But the circular dependency is just an > >>>> outcome of AXIOM getting wider usage as an XML model > >>>> > >>> Tuscany may also want to use AXIOM in an implementation of > >>> SDO2. Although the SCA implementation is migrating to Axis2, it > >>> would be better if the SDO part could just pick up AXIOM. It > >>> would help if it was available separately. > >>> > >>> -- Jeremy > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > >> > > > > > > -- ============================ Srinath Perera: > > http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/ > > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFD34EsjON2uBzUhh8RAnSyAJ9i0xtB/HB74C6xKxaDukacm7hssQCbBDbU > hSV1jNiqdRb/zigP1auWSrk= > =8wDv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
-- Chathura Herath http://chathurah.blogspot.com/
