I ran the build a bit ago and it ran just fine. I'm using maven 1.0.2
and here's my OS info:

Linux vishwa 2.6.10-5-386 #1 Mon Oct 10 11:15:41 UTC 2005 i686 GNU/Linux

Sanjiva.

On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 20:36 -0500, Bill Nagy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to build from the source tree (I've checked out the tree
> several times today), but aside from the terribly slow dependency
> fetching, when it tries to execute the junit tests on the core module,
> the org.apache.axis2.deployment.SameServiceAddingTest test fails.  The
> following is from the log file:
> 
> Testsuite: org.apache.axis2.deployment.SameServiceAddingTest
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.734 sec
> 
> ------------- Standard Output ---------------
> - conf directory not found , and no axis2.xml file is given ! System
> will continue using default_axis2.xml
> - Invalid service  .svn due to Invalid service META-INF directory not
> found; nested exception is:
>         org.apache.axis2.deployment.DeploymentException: Invalid service
> META-INF directory not found
> - Error in schema generating :null
> - Error in schema generating :null
> - Error in schema generating :null
> - Error in schema generating :null
> - Invalid service  service1 due to Two services can not have same name,
> a service with serevice1 already exists in the system
> ------------- ---------------- ---------------
> Testcase: testServiceGroup
> (org.apache.axis2.deployment.SameServiceAddingTest):
> FAILED
> null
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>         at
> org.apache.axis2.deployment.SameServiceAddingTest.testServiceGroup
> (SameServiceAddingTest.java:41)
>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:64)
>         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> 
> 
> Other than the Assertion failure, does the rest look normal?  I'm on
> Linux running maven 1.0.2 and I've tried both 1.4 and 1.5 JDKs always
> with the same outcome.  Thanks.
> 
> -Bill
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to