On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 06:37 -0600, R J Scheuerle Jr wrote: > > I am suggesting that an SAAJ node is lightweight delegates to a DOOM > node (which is very similar to the current design). I am also
OK. > suggesting that the DOOM node have a back pointer to its > corresponding SAAJ node (this is missing in the current design). -1 to this .. DOOM shouldn't know anything about SAAJ - that's just a DOM impl over OM. Why do we need this? We need to find another way to address this need .. Sanjiva.
