could you please point me to how it is being done in other java projects? (someone hinted at xerces)
thanks, dims On 2/16/06, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes. But not immediately. > > I'm OK deferring the URI resolution stuff to a 1.1 release as long as we plan > the release including defining the requirements and a time line. > > Lawrence Mandel > > > > > Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 02/16/2006 12:10 PM > > Please respond to > woden-dev > > > To [email protected] > > cc [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > > Subject Re: XmlSchema Release Revisited > > > > > > > > > Woden folks, > > any chance you can help with the URI resolution stuff? > > thanks, > dims > > On 2/16/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone listening? Any chance we can make this happen?? > > - Dan > > > > Dan Diephouse wrote: > > > So now that there is some assurance that we can read and write schemas > > > correctly, can we do a release of some sort? I'm OK with calling it > > > beta. But if it were up to me I would call it 1.0 and save the URI > > > resolution stuff for 1.1. I can only assume that this is the only > > > outstanding issue because it is the only one in JIRA still! ;-) > > > > > > Regarding the timeline of release - I feel that the timeline on a > > > project of this size is up to those involved. I.e. when patches/fixes > > > are committed then a new release happens. (yay open source!) > > > > > > Can we assume that all the stakeholders here are subscribed to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] now? > > > > > > - Dan > > > > > > > > > -- > > Dan Diephouse > > Envoi Solutions LLC > > http://envoisolutions.com > > http://netzooid.com/blog > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
