(You forgot the [axis2] prefix Steve ;-))

We need to fix this .. in the recent changes to the ListenerManager
stuff, we ended up with the current model. A few more days and you'll be
back to normal :).

I'm not sure of the answer for the backport issues.

Sanjiva.

On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 15:53 +0000, Steve Loughran wrote:
> Having got my code to compile again, I am now surprised to see that my 
> unit tests are failing because I dont have the concurrent backport, 
> which the SimpleHttpServer needs:
> 
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 
> edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue
>       at 
> org.apache.axis2.transport.http.server.SimpleHttpServer.<init>(SimpleHttpServer.java:117)
>       at 
> org.apache.axis2.transport.http.server.SimpleHttpServer.<init>(SimpleHttpServer.java:84)
>       at 
> org.apache.axis2.transport.http.SimpleHTTPServer.start(SimpleHTTPServer.java:184)
>       at 
> org.apache.axis2.engine.ListenerManager.start(ListenerManager.java:104)
>       at 
> org.apache.axis2.client.ServiceClient.initializeTransports(ServiceClient.java:151)
>       at org.apache.axis2.client.ServiceClient.<init>(ServiceClient.java:81)
>       at org.apache.axis2.client.ServiceClient.<init>(ServiceClient.java:160)
>       at 
> org.smartfrog.services.deployapi.client.ApiCall.<init>(ApiCall.java:82)
>       at 
> org.smartfrog.services.deployapi.client.Endpointer.createStub(Endpointer.java:151)
>       at 
> org.smartfrog.services.deployapi.test.unit.CallTest.createSystemCall(CallTest.java:89)
>       at 
> org.smartfrog.services.deployapi.test.unit.CallTest.testSystemEndpoint(CallTest.java:49)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
>       at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
>       at 
> com.intellij.rt.execution.junit2.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:32)
> 
> 1. I'm running Java1.5; no need for backported stuff.
> 
> 2. I didnt ask for an http server, and, for security reasons, would be 
> grateful if one were not started.

Reply via email to