On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:15 -0500, Srinath Perera wrote: > If we had constructor > public ServiceClient(ConfigurationContext configContext) throws AxisFault
Note that this idea is generally nonsensical: you want a client for a service but don't say for what service. However, we do have the simplest level of that auto supported already thru the no args constructor and the approach indicated below. > that would have been true, but what we have is > > public ServiceClient(ConfigurationContext configContext, > AxisService axisService) throws AxisFault If you really want to use the simplest ServiceClient API (where we auto create a dumb service underneath) then you can still do that .. pass null as the 2nd arg. So we already have the capability you're looking for. I'm still not convinced your scenario is very common: the user is advanced enough to create their own repo etc., but only wants to use the dumb anonymous service? Doesn't compute for me. But hey, its supported :). > I should create a repository, then a AxisService, add the operations > and then only call constructor. I can do that, but a new uesr would > not get it that easily. Can we add the first costructor? See above; its already there. Sanjiva.
